Cases 31 - 40 of 58
Payton et al v. Fresenius USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00937
Plaintiff:
Karissa Bellavia , Eric Melton , Viktoria Glotova and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA, Inc. , Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. , Fresenius USA Manufacturing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wealot v. Brooks et al
as 4:2014cv00309
Defendant:
Alvin Brooks, Darryl Forte, Michael Kilgore and others
Plaintiff:
Anna M Wealot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Gates v. Mukasey, et al
as 4:2013cv01125
Petitioner:
Larry Gates
Defendant:
William C Bowers and Michael Mukasey
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0923
Wiltsey et al v. Organon USA Inc et al
as 4:2013cv01524
Plaintiff:
Amy Wiltsey , Nancy Esquivel , Yvette McMurty and others
Defendant:
Organon USA Inc , Organon Pharmaceutical USA Inc , Organon International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gates v. Mortgage One Corporation d/b/a HFC Mortgage Company
as 5:2013cv06063
Plaintiff:
Loretta D. Gates
Defendant:
Mortgage One Corporation d/b/a HFC Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Gates v. Steele
as 4:2012cv01719
Petitioner:
Johnnie Gates
Respondent:
Troy Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gates-Colbert v. USA
as 1:2012cv00128
Petitioner:
Rebecca Elaine Gates-Colbert
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gates v. Liddell et al
as 4:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Gates
Defendant:
Butch Liddell, Jane Doe, Jeffery Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Denney et al
as 5:2012cv06051
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Ralph Gates
Defendant:
Larry Denney, Jestes, Kincaid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
