Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Alvarez et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 2:2017cv00414
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Alvarez , Theresa Alvarez , Cytheria Artis and others
Defendant:
Atlantic Richfield Company , Tesoro Corporation, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBBS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01785
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
FORREST GIBBS
214) 744-7590 (fax:
Ben C. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GIBBS-EL v. KNIGHT
as 1:2016cv00293
Petitioner:
KENNETH W. GIBBS-EL
Respondent:
DOUG HUYWVAERT, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD, WENDY KNIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBBS v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv01860
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
PAMELA R GIBBS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GIBBS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv01650
Petitioner:
KENNETH W. GIBBS
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBBS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2015cv01459
Petitioner:
KENNETH W GIBBS
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs, III v. Portage Indiana City of et al
as 2:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Gibbs, III
Defendant:
Richard Schmitt , Roger Peele and Portage Indiana City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBBS V. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2015cv00508
Petitioner:
KENNETH W GIBBS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs v. Superintendent
as 3:2015cv00128
Petitioner:
Kenneth W Gibbs
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
