Cases 31 - 40 of 111
Bissell v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02816
Plaintiff:
Glen R. Bissell
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gillispie et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Gillispie and Glen Gillispie
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29716
Plaintiff:
Roxann Phillips and Glen Phillips
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Henry et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27822
Plaintiff:
Jo-Ann Henry and Tommy Glen Henry
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carroll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27405
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Carroll and Glen Carroll
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kinsey et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv27408
Plaintiff:
Julie Kinsey and Glen Kinsey
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowers v. Perry et al
as 2:2014cv27242
Plaintiff:
Doran Bowers
Defendant:
Rory Perry, Robin Davis, Brent Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27205
Plaintiff:
Susan Richardson , Tracy Robinson , Jeff Robinson and others
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Gynecare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baldner et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv23180
Plaintiff:
Helen T. Baldner and Glen Baldner
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilkins et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv21622
Plaintiff:
Debrah Wilkins and Glen Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
