Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01656
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Love v. Gomez
as 2:2015cv01445
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Rudolph Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallcross v. Jackson et al
as 2:2015cv01266
Plaintiff:
Scott R Shallcross
Defendant:
Christopher Jackson, Edward Flynn, Donald Ours and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00809
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00731
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Federal Trade Commission v. Partners in Health Care Association Inc, et al
as 1:2014mc00053
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Partners in Health Care Association Inc, Gary L Kieper, United Solutions Group Inc and others
Trustee:
RBS Citizens Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
Gomez v. Racine Police Department et al
as 2:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Gomez
Defendant:
Racine Police Department and Douglas Cecchini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Wheaton Franciscan Health Care All Saints Hospital et al
as 2:2014cv00128
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Gomez
Defendant:
Wheaton Franciscan Health Care All Saints Hospital, Syed Karim, Heather Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Gomez v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc
as 2:2013cv00420
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
James Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gomez v. Social Security Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
as 2:2013cv00002
Plaintiff:
Deanna M Gomez
Defendant:
Social Security Office of Disability Adjudication and Review
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
