Cases 31 - 40 of 45
GRIMES v. KNIGHT
as 2:2013cv00013
Petitioner:
NEHEMIAH GRIMES
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanders v. Osburn et al
as 3:2012cv00442
Plaintiff:
Eric Sanders
Defendant:
Michael Osburn, James Bassinger, Jayne Grimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIMES v. THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2011cv00377
Defendant:
ENNIS ADAMS, JR., WILLARD GUPTON, JAMES HARRINGTON and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW GRIMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grimes et al v. United States of America
as 2:2010mc00059
Plaintiff:
S William Grimes
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GRIMES v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
as 3:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
KENNETH C. GRIMES
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
GRIMES v. HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2009cv00670
Plaintiff:
ERNEST HENRY GRIMES
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY, DR. JEFFREY KELLAMS, DR. STEVEN FEKETE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIMES v. BAKER HILL CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
as 1:2009cv00276
Plaintiff:
TERRI GRIMES
Defendant:
BAKER HILL CORPORATION WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01305
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
GRIMES v. NYHAN
as 1:2008cv00718
Plaintiff:
JUANITA B. GRIMES
Defendant:
THOMAS C. NYHAN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
