Cases 31 - 40 of 50
HARDY v. USA
as 1:2016cv00676
Petitioner:
XAVIER HARDY
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
White et al v. James Hardie Building Products Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
Charles White and Barbara White
Defendant:
James Hardie Building Products Inc. , Ron Henke and Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00433
Plaintiff:
Regina Hardy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hardy v. Schroth et al
as 3:2015cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tracey Arnell Hardy
Defendant:
Sgt Bryan Schroth, Det Andre Whitmyer, Det Greg Harder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hampton v. Fee et al
as 1:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Edward M Hampton
Defendant:
William C Fee, Michael W Hess and Robert J Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rorick et al v. Hardi North America Inc
as 1:2014cv00204
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rorick and Deanna Rorick
Defendant:
Hardi North America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01362
Plaintiff:
Marie Hardy
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC and Biomet Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARDY et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al
as 4:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANDERSON, LESLIE BANKS, KERRI CONFER and others
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HARDY v HOWELL
as 1:2011cv01423
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAMONTE HARDY, SR
Defendant:
RICHARD HOWELL and MUNCIE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Howell
as 1:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kenneth LaMonte Hardy, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Howell and Muncie Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
