Cases 31 - 40 of 1,552
Paxton v. Youngkin et al
as 3:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
Jamar Shante Paxton
Defendant:
Glenn Youngkin, Gary T. Settle and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crumpton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
William D. Crumpton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Harold Clarke, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atkins v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00565
Petitioner:
Daniel Atkins
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vyas v. Dotson et al
as 7:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Tarun Kumar Vyas
Respondent:
Harold Clarke, Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson, Jason Miyares and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lumpkin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Virginia Attorney General, Ken Baldassari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Burt v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Paul Leigh Burt
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Dr. William Miles and Dr. Hench Croff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Brown
Defendant:
Corrections Officer S. Collier, Correctional Officer S. Boggs, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foran v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Darius Lee Foran, Sr.
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kuzminski v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Kuzminski
Respondent:
Harold Clark, Earles and O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lodhi v. Dameron et al
as 8:2023cv02282
Plaintiff:
Saad Usman Lodhi
Defendant:
Treymane Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, David Robinson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
