Cases 31 - 40 of 104
WHITMAN v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 5:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
JAMES WHITMAN
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and BRYAN KEITH HINTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Barracuda Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Lowell Hill , Timothy Hinton , Tonie Holcombe and others
Defendant:
Barracuda Services, Inc. and Mark Headley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
MARTIN v. HINTON et al
as 5:2018cv00010
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
HINTON, MERRELL, MABLE CHANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. DOOLY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS DEPARTMENT
as 5:2017cv00361
Plaintiff:
JAMES M MARTIN
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS DEPARTMENT, HINTON, MERRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EHRLICH v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MATTHEW EHRLICH
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, GLEN JOHNSON, JAMES HINTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Bryan Hinton and Mercedes Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv02197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hinton
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02782
Plaintiff:
Robert Gentry, Elizabeth Brady, Michelle Ayala and others
Defendant:
Does 1 - 50, Ethicon, Inc., Covidien, LP and others
Not Classified By Court:
Exponent Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peyer v. Hinton
as 1:2017cv01159
Plaintiff:
Patrick Peyer
Defendant:
Helen Josephine Hinton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
