Cases 31 - 40 of 52
CISSE v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv06116
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED P. CISSE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, RIVERA, EADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS et al v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv05916
Plaintiff:
NEIL ROBERTS, ANDRE CHRISTIE, JOSE N. ESPINAL and others
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, RIVERA, DAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ORTIZ v. HUDSON COUNTY et al
as 2:2010cv05192
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ORTIZ
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, OSCAR AVILES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv05138
Plaintiff:
RICHARD JOHN WILLIAMS, ROBERTO V. HAMILTON, KIAN BARRETT and others
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES, RIVERA, EADY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURANT v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2010cv04957
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DURANT
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
JOHNSON v. SIMEUS et al
as 2:2010cv02494
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
SIMEUS, HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and MEDICAL DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 2:2010cv02011
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RITCHIE v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
as 2:2010cv01517
Plaintiff:
MARK RITCHIE
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VEGUILLA v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 2:2010cv01093
Plaintiff:
CRISTIAN O. VEGUILLA
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER and ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
