Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Pineda v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2015cv00693
Plaintiff:
Ali Pineda
Defendant:
Hamilton County, James Neil, Hamilton County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Austin v. Cincinnati City of et al
as 1:2015cv00608
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lee Austin
Defendant:
Cincinnati City of, P.O. Daniels, P.O. Sneed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Hamilton County Prosecutors Office et al
as 1:2015oe00561
Plaintiff:
Raymond Pratt
Defendant:
Hamilton County Prosecutors Office and Hamilton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Hamilton County Sheriff
as 1:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jones
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Readnour v. Berry et al
as 1:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jack Readnour
Defendant:
Ted Berry, Nadine Allen, Phillip Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Pippin v. Hamilton County Sheriff et al
as 1:2014cv00689
Plaintiff:
Tony D. Pippin
Defendant:
Hamilton County Sheriff and R. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hamilton County Sheriff
as 1:2014cv00567
Petitioner:
James Thomas
Respondent:
Hamilton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cunningham v. Hamilton County Sheriff
as 1:2014cv00377
Petitioner:
Robert Cunningham
Respondent:
Hamilton County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garrett et al v. West Chester Police Department et al
as 1:2013cv00499
Plaintiff:
Farnolia Garrett and Martel Garrett
Defendant:
West Chester Police Department, Andrew Schweier, Bradford Walraven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logue v. US Marshals et al
as 1:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Derek Logue
Defendant:
US Marshals, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office, Hamilton County Sheriff's Office Deputy with Badge #153 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
