Cases 31 - 40 of 150
Fourstar v. Rielly et al
as 1:2021cv02925
Plaintiff:
Victor C. Fourstar, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Rielly, Mary Fritsimmons, David Quintez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Denwalt et al
as 1:2021cv02595
Plaintiff:
Charles Lamont Williams
Defendant:
Simon Denwalt, Simon (I) Denwalt, Austin Chrestensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bockar v. Hansen
as 1:2021cv02197
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Bockar and Lawrence D. Bocker
Defendant:
Stephen Hansen and Stephen B. Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cokan Enterprises, Inc. v. Hansen Company, Inc., The
as 1:2021cv01925
Plaintiff:
Cokan Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Hansen Company, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hansen Construction, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
as 1:2021cv01796
Plaintiff:
Hansen Construction, Inc. and Jamin Cook
Defendant:
Ironbridge Homes, LLC
Garnishee:
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yakas et al v. Roark et al
as 1:2021cv01210
Defendant:
Alison Morgan, CoreCivic, Inc., Joel Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Pritchard and Joshua Yakas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vavala v. Hansen Construction Inc.
as 1:2020cv03126
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Vavala
Defendant:
Hansen Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hunter v. Caley et al
as 1:2021cv00542
Respondent:
Eddie Caley, Dean Williams and Matt Hansen
Petitioner:
James Henry Hunter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fourstar et al v. Bidden et al
as 1:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Drew Weissman, Jessie Slaughter, Mitch McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., Anthony Pacheco, Robert Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
