Cases 31 - 40 of 298
Thomas Arthur Gandara v. Gavin Newsome et al
as 5:2021cv01171
Petitioner:
Thomas Arthur Gandara
Respondent:
Gavin Newsome, Chad Bianco, Timothy J. Hollandhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gandara v. Newsome et al
as 3:2021cv05231
Plaintiff:
Thomas Arthur Gandara
Defendant:
Gavin Newsome, Chad Bianco, Timothy J. Hollandhorst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont Garner Karriem v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2021cv01145
Plaintiff:
Lamont Garner Karriem
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Superior Court of California, County of Riverside, Riverside County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Harmon v. Burton
as 2:2021cv01184
Petitioner:
Atraybion Harmon
Defendant:
Robert Burton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dipito LLC et al v. Manheim Riverside et al
as 3:2021cv01205
Defendant:
Manheim Riverside, Manheim Nevada, Manheim Investments Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Chidiebere Amadi, Richard John Hagen, Richard John Hagen doing business as Euromotorwerks and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Harmon et al v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01086
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Santander Consumer USA Inc.
Plaintiff:
Crystal Harmon and Clennard Harmon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
(PC) Gonzales v. Harmon et al
as 1:2021cv00796
Defendant:
Hernandez and Harmon
Plaintiff:
Michael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devin Maurice Harmon v. C.D.C.R. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2021cv04177
Defendant:
C.D.C.R. People of the State of California and CDCR Parole Agent Nichols
Plaintiff:
Devin Maurice Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03322
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
