Cases 31 - 40 of 360
I.H. et al v. County of Orange et al
as 5:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
I. H., ReeAnna Espino and Leslie Hooker
Defendant:
County of Orange, Corina De Haro, Ana L. Guerrero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as DE/1:22-CV-00841
Plaintiff:
Abaray, George Abaray, Juan Adame and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Abaray et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
George Abaray, Juan Adame, Jerry Adcox and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Eduardo Haro Lopez v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 8:2022cv01182
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Haro Lopez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
(PC) Meyers v. Kernan et al
as 1:2022cv00539
Plaintiff:
Leon Lee Meyers
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, K. Allison, R. Gamboa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00592
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination)
Perez, et al. v. Darling Ingredients, Inc., et al.
as 1:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Mauricia Perez, Angela Cruz, Juan Cruz and others
Defendant:
John Does I - X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Haro v. CSAA General Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Haro
Defendant:
CSAA General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
(PC) Haro v. Nguyen et al
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff:
Johnny Joe Haro
Defendant:
T. Nguyen, Kai-Chin Jeng and Gordon Lai
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haro-Aguilar v. Garland
as 22-591
Petitioner:
JAVIER RAFAEL HARO-AGUILAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
