Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Flowers v. Hinds County Sheriff Department ET, AL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff: Willie Flowers
Defendant: Hinds County Sheriff Department ET, AL, Attorney Craig L. Slay, Police Officer Cedar Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Hinds County Sheriff Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00644
Plaintiff: Fable Ronathan Adams
Defendant: Hinds County Sheriff Department and DA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00592
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Cain v. Hinds County Detention Facility et al
as 3:2007cv00567
Plaintiff: Calvin Lamar Cain
Defendant: Hinds County Detention Facility and Hinds County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2007cv00382
Plaintiff: Virgil B. Cole, III
Defendant: Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Charles Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stern v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00317
Plaintiff: James H. Stern
Defendant: State of Mississippi, Jim Hood, Hinds County Sheriff Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Mississippi et al
as 3:2007cv00215
Plaintiff: Lakeisha Green
Defendant: Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Mississippi and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Hinds County Sheriff Department
as 3:2007cv00135
Plaintiff: Dominic Maurice Young
Defendant: Hinds County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?