Cases 31 - 40 of 84
HOBBS v. CANINO et al
as 2:2013cv01355
Plaintiff:
DERRECK MICHAEL HOBBS, JR.
Defendant:
MARY CANINO, B. BLATT, ROBIN M. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CERQUA et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv06937
Plaintiff:
MARQ V. CERQUA, ANDREA CERQUA, DONALD ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hofnagle v. Pine Grove Borough et al
as 3:2012cv02468
Plaintiff:
Chad Hofnagle
Defendant:
Pine Grove Borough , Kimberly D. Brown-Zerbe , Christopher W. Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DICKERSON et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv03338
Plaintiff:
ERIC DICKERSON , CHARLES BROWN , HOYLE GRANGER and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBBS v. TABOR CHILDREN SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv06149
Plaintiff:
DURIA HOBBS
Defendant:
TABOR CHILDREN SERVICES, INC. and TABOR SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOBBS v. MYLAN, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05552
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HOBBS
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBBS et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67053
Plaintiff:
RAINEY E. HOBBS and ESTHER J. HOBBS
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBBS v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., ET AL.
as 2:2011cv67089
Plaintiff:
WALLACE L HOBBS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP., ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBBS v. JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
as 2:2011cv66858
Plaintiff:
BETTY A. HOBBS
Defendant:
JOHNS-MANVILLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
