Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Telford v. The Home Depot Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00222
Plaintiff: Holli Telford
Defendant: The Home Depot Inc and Citibank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Telford v. State of Idaho
as 4:2013cv00090
Petitioner: Holli Telford
Respondent: State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Telford v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2013cv05001
Plaintiff: Hollie Telford
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Idaho v. Telford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2012mc07216
Intervenor: USA
Plaintiff: State of Idaho
Defendant: Holli Telford
In re: Holli Lundahl
as 11-50211
Petitioner: In re: HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL
Marti Telford, et al v. Eric Lyon, et al
as 10-51123
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARTI TELFORD, HOLLI TELFORD and CINDY CHRISTENSON
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC LYON, KEVIN MCDONOUGH, UTAH DEPARTMENTS OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Type: Other Statutes RICO
Holli Lundahl v. USA, et al
as 10-11156
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, personally and as assignee of M.D. Diet Companies
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, VICKY GREGORY, MARY CORPORON and others
Telford et al v. Lyon et al
as 6:2010cv00154
Defendant: American Fork City, Dee Benson, Doe Bop and others
Plaintiff: Cindy Christenson, Holli Telford and Marti Telford
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Holli Lundahl v. USA, et al
as 10-10223
Plaintiff - Appellant: HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, personally and as assignee of M.D. Diet Companies
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER CARSWELL, R. E. GREGG, Doctor and others
Lundahl v. Compton
as 7:2010cv00009
Plaintiff: Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant: Jeffrey Compton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?