Cases 31 - 40 of 159
Robinson v. Holmes County Consolidated School District
as 3:2019cv00264
Defendant:
Holmes County Consolidated School District
Plaintiff:
Henry Robinson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes v. Day
as 2:2019cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paul H. Holmes and Bud
Defendant:
Dennis Day
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes v. The Lathan Company, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00040
Defendant:
The Lathan Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mary Margaret Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sprouse v. Harrison County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00285
Defendant:
Unknown Sahuque, Harrison County Sheriff, Sgt. Unknown McLemore and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Eugene Sprouse, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Meritor, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv00152
Defendant:
Textron, Inc., Rockwell Automation, Inc., The Boeing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robison Tire Company, Inc. v. Tuscaloosa Tire & Service Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv00125
Defendant:
Ronald H. Holmes, Jr. and Tuscaloosa Tire & Service Center, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robison Tire Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holmes et al v. Wise et al
as 3:2018cv00432
Defendant:
Automatic Systems, Inc., Craig Steven Wise and John Does 1-4
Plaintiff:
William Holmes and Bettie Holmes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmes County, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00403
Plaintiff:
Holmes County, Mississippi
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Holmes v. Rivers
as 4:2018cv00110
Petitioner:
Christopher Dreavonne Holmes
Respondent:
C. Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Holmes v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00340
Plaintiff:
Flora Mae Holmes
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill and Mike Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
