Cases 31 - 40 of 226
Hughes v. SoClean, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00445
Plaintiff:
Loreen Hughes
Defendant:
SoClean, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Lomax v. Hughes
as 1:2022cv00661
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ross Lomax
Defendant:
Melvin R. Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adams v. Horne et al
as 7:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
Dominique Herman Adams
Defendant:
Johnathan S. Horne, Daniel A. Rollins, Daniel C. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGHES v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
JOHN HUGHES, III
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Patricia K. Cushwa and MICHAEL CARVJAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melby v. Morgan et al
as 3:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dajade Elijah Melby
Defendant:
Sheriff Gabe Morgan, Sr., Sgt. T. Walker, Sgt. G. Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. USA
as 2:2022cv81495
Petitioner:
Joshua Hughes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Hughes v. Nottoway Correctional Center
as 3:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Samuel Hughes
Defendant:
Nottoway Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Andrew Fields, III
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden Streeval, A.W. Goldey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Allen v. Colonel Eric D. English et al
as 3:2021cv00784
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Allen, III
Defendant:
Colonel Eric D. English, Officer Earlenbaugh, Officer Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Tate Bywater Law Firm et al
as 1:2021cv01049
Plaintiff:
Patrick Hughes
Defendant:
Tate Bywater Law Firm, James R Tate, Douglas E. Bywater and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
