Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 31 - 40 of 101
HUMPHREYS v. DIPASQUALE
as 5:2015mc00261
Plaintiff: BRIAN HUMPHREYS
Defendant: NICHOLENE DIPASQUALE
Cause Of Action: Petition to Perpetuate Testimony
HUMPHREY v. CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL, INC.
as 2:2015cv01399
Plaintiff: KYLE HUMPHREY
Defendant: CUDD PRESSURE CONTROL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HUMPHREYS v. FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01059
Plaintiff: SHANE HUMPHREYS
Defendant: FINANCIAL ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INC. and DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUMPHREYS v. MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. et al
as 5:2015cv04355
Plaintiff: BRIAN HUMPHREYS
Defendant: MCCABE, WEISBERG & CONWAY, P.C. and RAYMOND C. MAJCZAN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
HUGHES v. HARPER et al
as 2:2015cv00586
Plaintiff: GREGORY L. HUGHES
Defendant: ORLANDO HARPER, SGT. KASS, SGT. NOYT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00029
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HUMPHREY et al v. PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2014cv06556
Plaintiff: DAVE HUMPHREY and ROB NASH
Defendant: PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC and PERCHERON LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HUMPHREY v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01349
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS E. HUMPHREY
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL, BRIAN COLEMAN, VINCENT MAZESKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUMPHREYS v. WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC.
as 2:2014cv01310
Plaintiff: SHANE HUMPHREYS
Defendant: WINDHAM PROFESSIONALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Humphrey v. Wetzel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv01683
Plaintiff: Douglas E Humphrey
Defendant: John E. Wetzel, Brian Coleman, Vincent Mazeski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?