Cases 31 - 40 of 113
United States of America v. Doyle, II et al
as 1:2019cv00317
Defendant:
James E. Doyle, II and Doyle Respiratory, LLC
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Chum v. Pacific Union Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv00684
Defendant:
GNMA II and Pacific Union Financial, LLC
Plaintiff:
Manny Chum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group v. A and J Tool & Findings Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00497
Defendant:
EEM, Inc., McDonald's Corporation, American Textile and others
Plaintiff:
Peterson Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group and Peterson - Puritan Site OU 2 Remedial Action Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Parshall v. Coastway Bancorp, Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00279
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Coastway Bancorp, Inc, Mark E Crevier, Debra M Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Perry v. Town of East Greenwich
as 1:2018cv00134
Plaintiff:
William Perry , Daniel Andrade , Seth Archambault and others
Defendant:
Town of East Greenwich
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hallam v. Wall et al
as 1:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Hallam, II
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Jeffery Aceto and Lieutenant Amaral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banchalter v. Merlo et al
as 1:2017cv00425
Defendant:
Larry J Merlo , David M Denton , David W. Dorman and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Banchalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DuPonte v. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Richard J. DuPonte, II
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Mathew Kettle, Jeffrey Aceto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Feghali v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00399
Plaintiff:
Elie Feghali
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, Larry J. Merlo, David M. Denton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
