Cases 31 - 40 of 40
PORTER v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv00649
Plaintiff:
ERNEST PORTER
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, IRMA VIHLIDAL and RICHARD S. ELLERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STALLSWORTH v. JIN et al
as 2:2011cv01086
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY STALLSWORTH
Defendant:
S. JIN, IRMA VIHLIDAL, MICHELLE LUCAS ANTANOVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASHINGTON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv01046
Plaintiff:
HENRY UNSELD WASHINGTON
Defendant:
LOUIS S. FOLINO, BYUNGHAK JIN, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANDOLPH v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2011cv03396
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL B. RANDOLPH, IV
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, JEFFREY BEARD, SHIRLEY MOORE-SMEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Rivera v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-4327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary of Corrections, LOUIS S. FOLINO, Superintendent and others
Frank Rivera v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
HOUSER v. BEARD et al
as 2:2010cv00416
Plaintiff:
DARIEN HOUSER
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD, STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL TOM CORBETT, SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Rivera v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-1227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, JEFFREY BEARD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
RIVERA v. PA DEP'T OF CORRS. et al
as 2:2009cv01604
Plaintiff:
FRANK RIVERA
Defendant:
PA DEP'T OF CORRS., JEFFREY A. BEARD, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CALDWELL v. FOGEL, et al
as 2:2008cv00728
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
ALAN B. FOGEL, CINDY S. WATSON, JEFF MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
