Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Iglesia Cristiana Luz y Verdad et al v. Church Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 5:2015cv05621
Plaintiff:
Iglesia Cristiana Luz y Verdad , Henry A. Espinoza , Max J. Espinoza and others
Defendant:
Church Mutual Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Giles v. California Corrections Health Care Services et al
as 4:2015cv04838
Plaintiff:
Ossie Giles
Defendant:
California Corrections Health Care Services, B. Naku, T. Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haden v. Chappell et al
as 4:2014cv05398
Plaintiff:
Steven Haden
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, J. Dela Cruz, J. Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Office of the Attorney Regulation, The et al
as 1:2014cv02289
Plaintiff:
David A. Harper
Defendant:
Office of Attorney Regulation, The, Adam J. Espinoza, Adam (I) J. Espinoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevenson v. Cordova et al
as 1:2014cv00649
Plaintiff:
William R. Stevenson
Defendant:
R. Cordova, R. (I) Cordova, D. Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keena Ester v. John Soto et al
as 2:2014cv00485
Defendant:
S. Barajas, S. Barajas, J. Espinoza and others
Plaintiff:
Keena Ester
Perry v. Tootell, et al.
as 3:2013cv03333
Plaintiff:
Elia Perry
Defendant:
E. Tootell, D. Leighton, D. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Jesus J Espinoza
as 2:2013cv03214
Defendant:
Jesus J Espinoza
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Curtis Henderson, Sr. v. California Department of Corr, et al
as 13-15725
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, J. ESPINOZA and others
Cal Max Properties LP v. Dennis Espinoza et al
as 5:2012cv01168
Plaintiff:
Cal Max Properties LP
Defendant:
Does and Dennis J Espinoza
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
