Cases 31 - 40 of 25,441
CORCORAN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02423
Plaintiff:
LISA CORCORAN
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ROSS v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02433
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK ROSS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASTNER v. BOHINSKI et al
as 2:2024cv02478
Petitioner:
STEVEN J. CASTNER
Respondent:
JASEN BOHINSKI, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHUMACHER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
as 2:2024cv02403
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J SHUMACHER
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
JAVIER v. CANNON et al
as 2:2024cv02407
Plaintiff:
ANEL HIPOLITO JAVIER
Defendant:
BRYAN J CANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364 Auto Negligence
BURWELL v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv02415
Plaintiff:
HISHINEA SILEAKA IMEANA BURWELL
Defendant:
Commissioner of Soc MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Copeland v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00918
Plaintiff:
Bernice A. Copeland
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COOPER v. LETIZIO et al
as 2:2024cv02463
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN COOPER
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR LETIZIO, E. CALIGURI, WELL PATH/CORRECT CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KEIM v. VANZOEREN
as 5:2024cv02365
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. KEIM
Defendant:
JAMES E. VANZOEREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
