Cases 31 - 40 of 235
HENDERSON v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv02159
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Plaintiff:
TAMMY J HENDERSON and TAMMY J. HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kearny v. Front Yard Residential Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv05218
Defendant:
Michael A. Eruzione, Front Yard Residential Corporation, Lazar Nikolic and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Kearny
Tavarres Henderson v. Foolks, et al
as 20-14808
Defendant / Appellee:
FOOLKS, Unit Manager, PARNELL, Officer and JACKSON, Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVARRES J. HENDERSON
Henderson v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv06213
Plaintiff:
Shelley Henderson and Shelley J Henderson
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Klein v. McDowell et al
as 1:2020cv10485
Defendant:
Michael A. Eruzione, George Whitfield McDowell, Lazar Nikolic and others
Plaintiff:
Melvyn Klein
Long v. Front Yard Residential Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01668
Plaintiff:
Cho Hui Long
Defendant:
Michael A. Eruzione, Front Yard Residential Corporation, Lazar Nikolic and others
Henderson v. Augusta Judicial Circuit et al
as 1:2020cv00175
Defendant:
Christopher M. Carr, Augusta Judicial Circuit, The City of Augusta and others
Plaintiff:
Tavarres J. Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braunstein v. Front Yard Residential Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv10110
Defendant:
Michael A. Eruzione, Front Yard Residential Corporation, Lazar Nikolic and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Braunstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv
Wang v. Front Yard Residential Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01598
Defendant:
Lazar Nikolic, Michael A. Eruzione, Front Yard Residential Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
HENDERSON v. FOOLKS et al
as 7:2020cv00210
Defendant:
PARNELL, FOOLKS and JACKSON
Plaintiff:
TAVARRES J HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
