Cases 31 - 40 of 60
HILL v. SAMUELS et al
as 3:2013cv02984
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
J. L Norwood , J. E. Thomas and Vince Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Thomas et al
as 1:2013cv02425
Petitioner:
Larry Johnson
Respondent:
J. E. Thomas, A. Jordan and J. L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DEAZA v. WATTERS et al
as 3:2013cv00073
Petitioner:
SANTOS DEAZA
Respondent:
HARREL WATTERS , J. L. NORWOOD , WARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PARKS v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2013cv00742
Plaintiff:
Darrell James Parks
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Harrell Watts, J. L Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEAZA v. WATTS et al
as 3:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
SANTOS DEAZA
Defendant:
HARLAN WATTS, J. L. NORWOOD, LINDA MARTINEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Bethea et al
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
Howard L. Hill, II
Defendant:
D. Bethea, R. Danchise, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MUNOZ v. WARDEN C. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2012cv00167
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PANIAGUA MUNOZ
Respondent:
WARDEN C. MAIORANA, N. WEIDLICH, J. TRIMBATH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hairston v. United States F.B.O.P. et al
as 1:2012cv00845
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Hairston, Sr.
Defendant:
United States F.B.O.P., Bledsoe, D. Kiefaber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stanley v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Darnell Stanley
Defendant:
United States Of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, David W. Ogden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
