Cases 31 - 40 of 160
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02897
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. James Murray
as 20-10271
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES MURRAY, AKA Jim Murray
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85797
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pierre v. Wyles et al
as 3:2020cv01015
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pierre, Donterrias Ambers, Xavier Rehm and others
Defendant:
David Callender, Unknown Wheat, Kevin Wyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Wyles et al
as 3:2020cv01033
Defendant:
Major Hatten, David Callender, Kevin Wyles and others
Plaintiff:
James Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierre et al v. Wyles et al
as 3:2020cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pierre, Donterrias Ambers, Xavier Rehm and others
Defendant:
David Callender, Unknown Wheat, Kevin Wyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76095
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30315
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MURRAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58299
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
as 4:2020cv00178
Defendant:
GADSDEN COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, JAMES MURRAY and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY ALONZO HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
