Cases 31 - 40 of 1,111
Lipsey v. Norum et al
as 2:2018cv00362
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lipsey, Jr.
Defendant:
Ron Barnes , Hatton , B Evert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Renny Claus v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-55185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RENNY CLAUS
Defendant - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary CDCR, GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA, Director Div. of Adult Parole, FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden and others
Renny Claus v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 18-80021
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
RENNY CLAUS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, Secretary CDCR, GUILLERMO VIERA ROSA, Director Div. of Adult Parole and FRANCISCO JACQUEZ, Warden, Does 1-2
Cogswell v. Allison et al
as 3:2018cv00299
Petitioner:
Henry Ivan Cogswell
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Jeffrey Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
John Hardney v. USDC-CASF
as 18-70058
:
In re: JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Petitioner:
JOHN FREDERICK HARDNEY
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
JEFFREY FERGUSON, JEFFREY BEARD and STEVEN TUCKER
Kevin R. Schrubb I v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2017cv08594
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Jeffrey Beard, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Schrubb, I
Ross Jay Curtis II v. Jeffrey Beard
as 2:2017cv07481
Respondent:
Jeffrey Beard
Petitioner:
Ross Jay Curtis II
James Sprague v. Jeffrey Beard
as 17-16792
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES SION SPRAGUE
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY BEARD
Joseph Cristiano v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-56299
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH A. CRISTIANO
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of California, SCOTT KERNAN, CDCR Director, JEFFREY BEARD, Former CDCR Director and others
Bradford v. Voong et al
as 4:2017cv04964
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Bradford
Defendant:
Minh Voong , Jeffrey Beard , J. Barba and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
