Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Jamison et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Jamison , Edward Jarrell , Edward Jesse and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc et al v. StoneEagle Services Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00902
Plaintiff:
Talon Transaction Technologies Inc and NexPay Inc
Defendant:
StoneEagle Services Inc , VPay Inc , Robert Mark Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud & Abuse Act
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Warren
as 4:2011cv04074
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Jeffrey Warren
Cause Of Action: Mortgage Foreclosure
Lawrence Stevens v. Ed Culp, et al
as 11-1714
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE STEVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
ED CULP, sued as Ed Culp, Detective Macon County, JEFFREY WARREN, DONALD W. HOTWICK, sued as Donald W. Hotwick, detective macon County and others
Stevens v. Culp et al
as 2:2010cv02263
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stevens
Defendant:
Ed Culp, Jeffrey Warren, Donald W Hotwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Mills Corporation Securiti
as 10-1150
:
In re: THE MILLS CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Appellant:
DANIEL ROCKER
Plaintiff - Appellee:
IOWA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Plaintiff:
IRWIN BERLIN, On behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, VERNON E. RUDOLPH, FREDERIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - None:
KENNETH R. PARENT, NICHOLAS MCDONOUGH, JOHN M. INGRAM and others
Party-in-Interest - None:
JOHN J. MCAVOY
Appellee:
JEFFREY WARREN GOLAN, JEFFREY ALAN BARRACK, CHAD A. CARDER and others
Movant - None:
KANAM SERVICES L.P., KANAM MANAGEMENT LLC, KANAM PROVIDERS INCORPORATED and others
Warren v. Astrue
as 6:2009cv06217
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Warren
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
