Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Mitchell v. Martin et al
as 3:2015cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mitchell
Defendant:
Joey Martin and Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Addison v. Richmond, et al
as 15-3141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
Richmond, Correctional Officer, Poinsett County Detention Center, Joey Martin, Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center, Larry Mills, Sheriff, Poinsett County Detention Center and others
Addison v. Martin et al
as 3:2015cv00308
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant:
Joey Martin and Poinsett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nicholas Addison v. Joey Martin
as 15-3106
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
Joey Martin, Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center
Nicholas Addison v. Joey Martin
as 15-3045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
Joey Martin, Jail Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center
Nicholas Addison v. Gary Gilbert, et al
as 15-3058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
Gary Gilbert, Jailer, Correctional Officer, Poinsett County Detention Center and Joey Martin, Jail Administrator, Poinsett County Detention Center
Addison v. Martin et al
as 3:2015cv00290
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Addison
Defendant:
Joey Martin and Poinsett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addison v. Martin
as 3:2015cv00282
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant:
Joey Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addison v. Martin et al
as 3:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant:
Joey Martin and Kim Muse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Addison v. Martin et al
as 3:2015cv00289
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant:
Joey Martin and Poinsett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
