Cases 31 - 40 of 136
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Patrick Delices v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3493
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFREY SOMMERS, Associate Proffessor and former Advisor in his official and individual capacities, JOHANNES BRITZ, Chief Academic Officer/Provost in his official and individual capacities, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MILWAUKEE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK DELICES
Wells v. Hect et al
as 2:2020cv01796
Defendant:
Jane Doe Hect, David Hect, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and others
Plaintiff:
Ledurial J Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Christman v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00530
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology, Inc., John/Jane Does I-X and Wright Medical Technology, Inc. a Delaware corporation doing business as Microport
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Christman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. City of Kent et al
as 2:2020cv01808
Defendant:
Ward, D McCuistion, John/Jane Does 1-XX and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00493
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gatto v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2020cv01684
Defendant:
Officers John/Jane Doe I-IV, Officer Eric Jordan, Dunmore Borough and others
Plaintiff:
Katie Gatto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
