Cases 31 - 40 of 160
Jordan v. Bivens et al
as 1:2022cv00611
Petitioner:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Respondent:
Warden Carlos Bivens and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frink, et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANTHONY FRINK, DANNY L JORDAN, DEBRA J HOLCOMB and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Jordan v. Seltzer et al
as 1:2021cv03048
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Tom Seltzer, West, Vanessa Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jordan v. Warden Bivens et al
as 1:2021cv02934
Plaintiff:
Wayne Arthur Jordan
Defendant:
Warden Bivens, Warden Weber, Dr. Choudry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Jordan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
as 8:2021cv02903
Plaintiff:
Larry Jordan
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morales et al v. Harvest Hospitalities, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02482
Plaintiff:
Claudio Morales-Lacayo, Jamie Sutton, Jasmine Cooley and others
Defendant:
Harvest Hospitalities, Inc., Sattar Shaik, Harvest Associates Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saunders v. Bennett et al
as 8:2021cv02431
Plaintiff:
Gary Antoine Saunders, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Jordan Bennett and Town of Forest Heights
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Jordan v. Maryland Attorney General
as 1:2021cv02085
Petitioner:
Brian Jordan
Respondent:
Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Watts et al
as 1:2021cv01901
Plaintiff:
Jordan Alexander Brooks
Defendant:
Gail Watts and Sgt. A. Dupree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
