Cases 31 - 40 of 155
Varsity Spirit, LLC v. Quintero
as 2:2021cv02191
Defendant:
Josh Quintero
Plaintiff:
Varsity Spirit, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lobozzo v. Blount County et al
as 3:2021cv00115
Defendant:
James Berrong, Keith Gregory, Blount County and others
Plaintiff:
Josh Lobozzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burchfield v. Brooks et al
as 3:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Sgt Stergil, Lt. Berry, Lt. Josh and others
Plaintiff:
Sam Burchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Cocke County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2021cv00002
Defendant:
Jessica Huff, Armando Fontes, Josh Hartsell and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dexter Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Manning v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Jessica Huff, Armando Fontes, Josh Hartsell and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Dexter Manning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kile v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2020cv00501
Plaintiff:
Phil Lomonaco, Hoai Robinette, Rockford King and others
Defendant:
CRYSTAL UNDERWOOD, DETECTIVE BRIAN JENKINS, Loudon County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanHooser v. District Attorney General's Office for the 12th Judicial District of Tennessee et al
as 4:2020cv00050
Defendant:
Cody Smith, J Michael Taylor, Jason Legg and others
Plaintiff:
Tara VanHooser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Phelps et al v. SumiRiko Tennessee, Inc. (TV1)
as 3:2020cv00421
Plaintiff:
Dusty Phelps, Miranda Evans, Micalah Taylor and others
Defendant:
SumiRiko Tennessee, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smith v. C R Bard Inc et al
as 1:2020cv00245
Plaintiff:
Josh Smith
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, McKesson Corporation, C R Bard Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynolds v. Cocke County et al
as 2:2020cv00177
Defendant:
Lt Rae Edison, Sgt Mark Keiser, Lt Stephen Revill and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
