Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Stiles v. Kelly
as 4:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lee Stiles, Sr.
Defendant:
Judy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Silk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2009cv00474
Plaintiff:
Judy A Silk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Barnes v. Bradshaw et al
as 4:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Stewart Barnes
Defendant:
Judy Bradshaw and City of Des Moines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brodersen v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2009cv00098
Plaintiff:
Judy Brodersen
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America v. Ross et al
as 5:2009cv04008
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Debbie S. Ross, Larry Corderman, Larry Whittle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Leaf Funding, Inc. v. Wills AG Supply, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00476
Plaintiff:
Leaf Funding, Inc.
Defendant:
Wills AG Supply, Inc., Curtis Wills, Judy Wills and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kulow v. Milks
as 4:2007cv00493
Plaintiff:
Ronald Kulow
Defendant:
Judy Milks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Natta et al v. Doherty et al
as 6:2007cv02064
Plaintiff:
Wayne Van Natta, Wayne Van Natta, Wayne Van Natta and others
Defendant:
Sam Doherty, Taga Holdings, Inc. and CanAmerica Global, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 5:2007cv04058
Petitioner:
Jan F Becker
Defendant:
Stewart Hudson, G W Bush, A Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
