Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Kane v. UPS Pension Plan Board of Trustees
as 1:2011cv03719
Defendant:
UPS Pension Plan Board of Trustees
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kane
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Luber v. Anne Arundel County, Maryland et al
as 1:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Ronald Luber
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County, Maryland, Anne Hatcher, Mary Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Kane Company v. Motir Services Inc.
as 8:2009cv02891
Plaintiff:
Kane Company
Defendant:
Motir Services Inc. and Motir Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bruce et al v. Kane et al
as 1:2009cv02445
Plaintiff:
Nadine Bruce, M.A.M., Jr., Laverne Matthie Smith and others
Defendant:
Thomas Edgar Kane, Thomas Edgar Kane, Brown Investments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Kane v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2008cv02378
Plaintiff:
James T. Kane, Jr.
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Kane v. Lewis et al
as 1:2008cv01157
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kane
Defendant:
Brian Lewis, John Lewis, Jensen Shorter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jenkins et al v. Dorchester County Board of Education et al
as 1:2008cv00389
Plaintiff:
Sheretta Jenkins, Andrea Johnson, Cedric Johnson and others
Defendant:
Dorchester County Board of Education, Vaughn Evans, Frederic R. Hildenbrand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv02494
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Steny Hoyer, John Sarbanes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
