Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Kent, Richard v. Berryhill, Nancy
as 3:2017cv00833
Plaintiff:
Richard Kent
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barrett, Brock et al v. Itstein, Joe et al
as 3:2017cv00610
Plaintiff:
Brock B. Barrett and Suzanne A. (Hogan) Kent-Barrett
Defendant:
Joe Itstein, Kris Kiel and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kent v. Stoelting et al
as 2:2017cv00893
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kent
Defendant:
Scott D. Rued, Ivor J. Evans, Curtis Stoelting and others
Nominal Defendant:
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc. and Roadrunner Transportation Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Chester County Employees Retirement Fund
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Flanagan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zach, Thomas v. Beahm, Brian et al
as 3:2016cv00823
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Zach
Defendant:
Brian Beahm , Brian Green, Troy Hermans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kent v. Lukas et al
as 2:2016cv01358
Plaintiff:
Antron Kent
Defendant:
Thomas Lukas, Brian Gove, Shaun McGregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartshorn v. Sauver et al
as 2:2016cv01226
Plaintiff:
Henry W Hartshorn
Defendant:
Jerome Sauver, Chris Lesperance, Steph Timblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paterick v. Wensco of Michigan Corporation
as 2:2016cv00858
Plaintiff:
Kent Paterick
Defendant:
Wensco of Michigan Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Upthegrove v. Bartow et al
as 2:2016cv00424
Plaintiff:
Samuel S Upthegrove
Defendant:
Byran Bartow, Mary Klemz, Craig Bluemer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kobishop v. Brey et al
as 1:2015cv01077
Plaintiff:
Jerome W Kobishop
Defendant:
Alan Brey, David Miron, Francis Boil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, Damien v. City of Madison Special Investigation Unit et al
as 3:2015cv00203
Plaintiff:
Damien D. Smith
Defendant:
City of Madison Special Investigation Unit, Nobel Ray, David Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
