Cases 31 - 40 of 40
COOPER et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03156
Plaintiff:
JARROD JONES, JAMES MAGLOTHIN, GARY HARRIS and others
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KEEFER v. USA
as 3:2019cv03285
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
STERLING RANDALL KEEFER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Keeter et al v. City of Jacksonville et al
as 3:2017cv01028
Plaintiff:
Judy Ann Jean Keeter and Robert Keefer
Defendant:
City of Jacksonville, Mark Harrison Mahon, Karen K. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham v. Keefer
as 6:2017cv00261
Plaintiff:
Travis Cunningham
Defendant:
Lonnie Keefer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Keefer et al
as 3:2016cv00029
Plaintiff:
Carlos Lamar Smith
Defendant:
Keefer and Stroupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keefer v. CitiMortgage et al
as 2:2015cv14256
Plaintiff:
Frank Keefer
Defendant:
CitiMortgage , Paul Ince, Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Keefer v. Operation Par, Inc.
as 8:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
Corey Keefer
Defendant:
Operation Par, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Davis v. Chrysler Group LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00840
Plaintiff:
Dominick Leroy Davis
Defendant:
Chrysler Group LLC, Jacksonville Chrysler Jeep, Howard Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Keefer v. Loyal Order of Moose Gulf Gate Lodge #608, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv02275
Plaintiff:
Mark Keefer
Defendant:
Loyal Order of Moose Gulf Gate Lodge #608, Inc., Thomas Stringer, Raymond McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Angel et al v. American Homehealth, Inc. et al
as 8:2008cv00486
Plaintiff:
Garyn Angel, A.R. Angel Living Trust, Angel Family Trust and others
Defendant:
American Homehealth, Inc., Raul Leonides Lora, Raul Leonides Lora and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
