Cases 31 - 40 of 816
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Ballard v. Boyd et al
as 8:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Ballard
Defendant:
Taggert Boyd, Shane Thurman and Dr. Danial Danaher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reffett v. Henery et al
as 8:2023cv00176
Plaintiff:
William Emory Reffett
Defendant:
Donald G. Henery, Donna F Taylor, Hanna L Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trimble v. Kijakazi
as 8:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Trimble and Donald Trimble
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Williams v. Wainstein et al
as 8:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Michael Keith Williams
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Wainstein, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perry Jr. v. Cox Communications et al
as 8:2023cv00121
Plaintiff:
Russell T. Perry Jr. and Russell Perry, II
Defendant:
Cox Communications, Pamela L. and Lea Ann Sumrall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ringland v. Fauber
as 8:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Mark Ringland
Defendant:
Brenda L. Fauber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Soc/theft/And/Id Theft
as 8:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Smith
Defendant:
Soc/theft/And/Id Theft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ashford v. USA
as 4:2023cv03017
Petitioner:
Devin L. Ashford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
L&J Asset Holdings, LLC v. City of Bellevue et al
as 8:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
L&J Asset Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
City of Bellevue and City of Bellevue Board of Equalization
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
