Cases 31 - 40 of 209
SMITH et al v. CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2018cv02423
Plaintiff:
FRED E. SMITH and MATTIE L. SMITH
Defendant:
CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA and LAW OFFICE OF GREGORY JAVARDIAN LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cooper et al v. McPheron et al
as 3:2018cv01092
Plaintiff:
Sharika Cooper and Bryan Francis
Defendant:
Thomas McPheron and A. L. Smith Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Tomasko et al
as 3:2018cv00944
Plaintiff:
Alan C. Smith and Cindy L. Smith
Defendant:
Marshelle C. Tomasko , David Tomasko and Sherry M. Tomasko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. Target Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02055
Plaintiff:
Katherine L. Smith and Michael Smith
Defendant:
Target Corporation , Target Store #2567 and Kellermeyer Bergensons Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SMITH v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv00337
Plaintiff:
NICOLE L. SMITH
Defendant:
HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Ridge v. Giglio et al
as 3:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Luther T. Ridge, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael A. Giglio, Larry R. Snyder, Jorge E. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
K.S. et al v. Mifflin County et al
as 1:2017cv00036
Plaintiff:
K.S. and J.H.
Defendant:
Mifflin County , Casey O'Dell , Kristen Matula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Garrnett et al
as 1:2016cv02236
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith, William V. Smith and Michael L. Smith
Defendant:
Tracy Garrnett, Greg Palese, Shirley Sowzioral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
