Cases 31 - 40 of 46
FAKE et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2020cv01283
Defendant:
WILLIAM H. KETTERLINUS, BRIAN ZARALLO, ANITA N. BOTCHWAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAITLIN B. FAKE, SUSAN B. FAKE and BRANDON L. FAKE
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00916
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00758
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BENNETT v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2020cv00712
Petitioner:
TERRELL BENNETT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and SCI-CHESTER SUPT. MARRISA LAMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANDREWS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00556
Defendant:
LAWRENCE S. KRASNER, CHRISTINE COULTER, JACQUELINE F. ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
BAHIYA MORTON ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RUSH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv05816
Petitioner:
LARRY RUSH and LEROY THOMAS
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ROBERT GILMORE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOPER v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2019cv05604
Petitioner:
HOWARD COOPER
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LAWRENCE S. KRASNER PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JACOBS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv04616
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, TRACY TRIPP and others
Plaintiff:
DETECTIVE DERRICK JACOBS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GAGO v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv03064
Petitioner:
EDWIN GAGO
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, TERESA DELBALSO, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
