Cases 31 - 37 of 37
MURPHY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS et al
as 2:2009cv03887
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS X. MURPHY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA C/O THE LAW DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOW TRUCK OPERATORS OF PHILADELPHIA, L.L.C. et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv05002
Plaintiff:
TOW TRUCK OPERATORS OF PHILADELPHIA, L.L.C., SELECT RECOVERY SERVICES and CENTER CITY TOWING
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADDICTION MEDICINE AND HEALTH ADVOCATES, INC. et al v. PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS et al
as 2:2008cv03836
Plaintiff:
ADDICTION MEDICINE AND HEALTH ADVOCATES, INC. and TEL WELL, INC.
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
JOHNSON v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv01748
Plaintiff:
KENYATTA JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBERTS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2007cv04582
Plaintiff:
DAMON K. ROBERTS
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DEPARTMENT OF LICENSES AND INSPECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEN et al
as 2:2007cv03535
Plaintiff:
DAMEEN JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEN, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COPPEDGE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LICENSE AND INSPECTIONS et al
as 2:2007cv00476
Plaintiff:
JAMES COPPEDGE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA LICENSE AND INSPECTIONS, C.M. DANIELS, ROGER TENANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
