Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Anderson v. Lockett et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. Lockett, Sgt. Lamar and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv03550
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Phillips et al
as 2:2010cv00429
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tanya Phillips, Jonathan Robert Dillon, Anthony Lockett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Smoots v. Lockett et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00627
Plaintiff:
Arthur L. Smoots
Defendant:
John R. Lockett, John M. Tyson, Jr., A. Kelli Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. Matthews (INMATE1)
as 2:2009cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul Vincent Lockett
Defendant:
Jeremiah Matthews
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2008cv02370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lockett v. State of Alabama et al
as 1:2008cv00447
Petitioner:
Sylvester Lockett
Respondent:
State of Alabama, Lillian Watson-Foster and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lockett v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2008cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Lockett
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Lillie Watson-Forster and Troy King
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. Lockett et al
as 1:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
Richard Daron Kennedy
Defendant:
John R. Lockett and JoJo Schwarzauer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lockett v. Mitchem et al (INMATE3)
as 2:2008cv00113
Plaintiff:
Aljay Lockett, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden Mitchem and Troy King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
