Cases 31 - 39 of 39
LACY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 2:2014cv00351
Respondent:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Petitioner:
ENDRICE LACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAISER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv01480
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
LACI C KAISER
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY v. WASHINGTON RENTALS, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00028
Defendant:
STEVEN POTTS, DANIEL WADSWORTH, LACY L. WADSWORTH and others
Plaintiff:
PROPERTY-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LACY v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv00811
Defendant:
CARI BREZMAN, KEITH BUTTS, JANICE DOWNS and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Cummins et al
as 3:2013cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joel Williams, Jr
Defendant:
J A Cummins, Greg Ellison, Mark R McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LACY v. TIME DISPATCH SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00819
Defendant:
DLS LOGISTICS, LLC, PAUL THOMAS MORRIS and TIME DISPATCH SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
GREGORY LACY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BURTON et al v. LACY et al
as 1:2007cv00918
Plaintiff:
BERTHA BURTON, BERTHA BURTON, EDGAR BURTON and others
Defendant:
LARRY R. LACY, SHELBY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and SHELBY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
