Cases 31 - 40 of 487
KOFFLER v. GRAYS LANE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
as 2:2022cv01890
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN KOFFLER
Defendant:
GRAYS LANE HOUSE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
IN RE: CARLTON LANE
as 2:2022cv01812
Petitioner:
CARLTON LANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CICCOTELLI v. UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv05610
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
UMPQUA HOLDINGS CORPORATION, PEGGY YVONNE FLOWER, BRYAN L TIMM and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. BASLER, INC.
as 2:2021cv05160
Plaintiff:
CEDAR LANE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Defendant:
BASLER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
LANE v. MASON et al
as 5:2021cv03780
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LANE
Respondent:
BERNADETTE MASON, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LEHIGH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES-LANE v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2021cv20050
Plaintiff:
DONA JONES-LANE
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MCKESSON CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saunders v. Turner et al
as 1:2021cv01421
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Saunders
Defendant:
Alphonso Turner, John W. Lester Williams, Carl Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JUSTICE v. CORELOGIC, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01542
Defendant:
CLAUDIA FAN MUNCE, W. STEVE ALBRECHT, JAYNIE MILLER STUDENMUND and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY D. JUSTICE, II.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
SIMMONS v. CENTRAL OUTREACH et al
as 2:2021cv00308
Defendant:
JULIE MINCH, CENTRAL OUTREACH and DR. STACY LANE
Plaintiff:
ALVIN R. SIMMONS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Hartman et al
as 3:2021cv00401
Defendant:
Barry Karwowski, Harold Kertes, John Battenberg and others
Plaintiff:
James T. Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
