Cases 31 - 40 of 54
Lazo et al v. M&G Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00523
Plaintiff:
Sergio Lazo , Robert Mejia , Ricky Lee Vasquez and others
Defendant:
M&G Corporation, Integrity Mechanical Specialists, LLC, Richard Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
KBF Security, Inc. v. AOF Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00727
Plaintiff:
KBF Security, Inc.
Defendant:
AOF Services, LLC, Amit Sharma and Len Rao
Garnishee:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Retaliation Wrongful Termination
Cheatham v. Len Dubois Trucking, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00116
Plaintiff:
Michelle Cheatham
Defendant:
Len Dubois Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kobace LLC v. Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
as 6:2016cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kobace LLC
Defendant:
Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BSG Tech LLC v. Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01146
Plaintiff:
BSG Tech LLC
Defendant:
Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VideoSqope, LLC v. Gradient Lens Corporation
as 6:2015cv00541
Plaintiff:
VideoSqope, LLC
Defendant:
Gradient Lens Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00557
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Arlington Contact Lens Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Elstad v. Ice-Tech Advanced Lens Technologies et al
as 3:2014cv01540
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elstad
Defendant:
Ice-Tech Advanced Lens Technologies and Allen Weatherby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livings v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv00421
Petitioner:
Dennis Len Livings
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Doe v. The City of San Antonio, et al
as 5:2014cv00102
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
William McManus, Officer, Jackie "Jack" Len Neal and The City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
