Cases 31 - 40 of 600
J.G. v. Rustic Pathways, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv05666
Plaintiff:
J. G.
Defendant:
JOHN ROE, B. A., C. A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Monaco v. Watson
as 1:2023cv01328
Plaintiff:
Leopold Thomas Monaco
Defendant:
Elissa Watson, AirBnb, Inc., AirBnb RPG, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv21584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rachel Leopold et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 2:2023cv02915
Plaintiff:
Rachel Leopold and Eric Leopold
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LEOPOLD et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
JASON LEOPOLD and BLOOMBERG L.P.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Cross v. Garland
as 21-6479
Not Yet Classified:
KRISTIN MACLEOD-BALL, -, TRINA A. REALMUTO, -, ANDREW WACHTENHEIM, - and others
Petitioner:
RIDEL LEOPOLD CROSS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
LEOPOLD et al v. NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00696
Plaintiff:
JASON LEOPOLD and BLOOMBERG L.P.
Defendant:
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Gnahoui David v. Garland
as 21-6654
Petitioner:
GERARD LEOPOLD GNAHOUI DAVID
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
MPawinayo v. Hall
as 3:2023cv00277
Plaintiff:
Leopold MPawinayo
Defendant:
Daron Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvarado v. Benston et al
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Defendant:
Alderman, Sgt Joseph Beahm, Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
