Cases 31 - 40 of 685
Moore v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv03454
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stacy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bossen et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc
as 1:2019cv21443
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc
Plaintiff:
MICHEL Bossen and MARIA VIERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bossen et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc
as 1:2019cv02822
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michel Bossen and Maria Viera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glennon v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 1:2019cv02821
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chris Glennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Glennon v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00394
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chris Glennon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Diana Cantu-Guerrero v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
as 19-1231
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHAWN BURKE, KAREN HOTALING, individuals on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ERIN FLOREZ, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware corporation
Undetermined:
DIANA CANTU-GUERRERO
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. v. F9 Properties, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00020
Defendant:
F9 Properties, LLC and Wood on Wood Road, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bossen et al v. Lumber Liquidators, Inc
as 0:2019cv60967
Defendant:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc
Plaintiff:
MICHEL Bossen and MARIA VIERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lumber Liquidators, Inc. v. Cabinets to Go, LLC f/k/a Designers' Surplus
as 3:2019cv00153
Plaintiff:
Lumber Liquidators, Inc.
Defendant:
Cabinets to Go, LLC f/k/a Designers' Surplus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
