Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Denise Subramaniam v. Gabrielle Richards, et al
as 17-35982
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENISE SUBRAMANIAM
Defendant - Appellee:
GABRIELLE D. RICHARDS, ERCIK J. HAYNIE, PERKINS COIE LLP and others
Fauley v. Mosman et al
as 3:2017cv01656
Plaintiff:
Robynne A. Fauley
Defendant:
Erick J. Haynie, Marco A. Hernandez, Michael W. Mosman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Subramaniam v. Richards et al
as 3:2017cv01627
Defendant:
Ercik J. Haynie, Marco A. Hernandez, Michael W. Mosman and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Subramaniam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shore v. Hernandez
as 3:2017cv01607
Defendant:
Marco A. Hernandez
Plaintiff:
Jay Vincent Shore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hernandez v. The Kraft Bistro, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv06912
Plaintiff:
Marcos Antonio Hernandez
Defendant:
The Kraft Bistro, Ltd. and Khalil Wahab
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marcos Hernanez Dono v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71622
Petitioner:
MARCOS J. HERNANEZ DONO, AKA Marcos Josue Hernandez, AKA Marcos J. Hernandezdono
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Jorge Hernandez-Ramirez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71634
Petitioner:
JORGE EMILIO HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ and MARCO ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-CONSEPCION
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
USA v. Marco Hernandez-Prado
as 16-41140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARCO ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-PRADO
Marcos Pinon-Hernandez v. Loretta Lynch
as 16-3457
Petitioner:
MARCOS PINON-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, U.S. Attorney General
Gil Jr et al v. De Laune Drilling Service, Ltd et al
as 2:2016cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Gil, Jr. , Pablo Alaniz, Jr. , Juan Ortiz and others
Defendant:
De Laune Drilling Service, Ltd , De Laune Drilling Service Management Co., LLC , Bernie De Laune and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
