Cases 31 - 40 of 230
Gilmore v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00017
Defendant:
Infowars, LLC, Lee Stranahan, Scott Creighton and others
Plaintiff:
Brennan M. Gilmore
Amicus Curiae:
Veronique de la Rosa, Neil Heslin, Civil Procedure Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Alfred S Thomas, Jr., City of Charlottesville, Attorney Joseph D. Platania and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Scott v. Mullins et al
as 7:2022cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maurice Preston Scott
Defendant:
Sgt. Robinson, Ofc. Thompson, Ofc(s) of A&B Day & Night Shift and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinkfield v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Maurice J. Sinkfield
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hawkins v. Gregory
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Miss. Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Meyer et al
as 1:2021cv01428
Plaintiff:
Wayne Alphonso Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Thomas Meyer, Ross Maurice, Dichell Wiliams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lomax v. Rutter Mills Law Firm
as 2:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Alvin Maurice Lomax
Defendant:
Rutter Mills Law Firm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hawkins v. Scott
as 3:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hawkins
Defendant:
Judge Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Reynolds et al
as 7:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Scott
Defendant:
Mr. Reynolds, Melvin Davis and B. J. Ravizee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Sgt. Kamm et al
as 1:2021cv01132
Plaintiff:
Paul Maurice Butler
Defendant:
Sgt. Kamm, Superintendent Hudson and Capt Diehi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Alyssa D Emery, Erin Schaible, Joe Johnson #22 and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Lockhart, K. L. and B. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
