Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 45
In re: In Re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 10-1608
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant - Respondent: GERALD ROZUM and ATTY GEN PA
PENDLETON v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2010cv00027
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD L. ROZUM and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garcia et al v. LCS Corrections Services, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00334
Defendant: LCS Corrections Services, Inc., LCS Corrections Services, Inc., Miguel A Niderhauser and others
Plaintiff: Monica Garcia and Monica Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Torts - Injury None
In re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 09-3221
Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALGHNY
PENDLETON v. ROZUM et al
as 3:2009cv00175
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In Re: Michael Pendleton, et al
as 09-2407
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: GERALD ROZUM, ATTY GEN PA and DA ALGHNY
In Re: Michael J. Pendleton
as 09-1934
Not Party - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Not Party - Respondent: RAYMOND SOBINA, DA ALGHNY and ATTY GEN PA
In re: Michael Pendleton v. Gerald Rozum, et al
as 08-4222
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Defendant - Respondent: ATTY GEN PA, DA ALGHNY and GERALD ROZUM
In Re: Michael J. Pendleton
as 08-3576
Not Party - Petitioner: In re: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
PENDLETON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 3:2008cv00199
Petitioner: MICHAEL J. PENDLETON
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?