Cases 31 - 40 of 344
Chi v. Schell et al
as 4:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
Richard A. Schell, Kimberly C. Priest Johnson, Andrew Milton Stover and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hinson v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Milton Hinson
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Craig Jordan and C Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. The State of Texas
as 3:2022cv00743
Petitioner:
Mark Milton Moore and Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles
Respondent:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00210
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Grizzle v. Mcintire et al
as 5:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Defendant:
Bryson Mcintire, Madison Hendricks, Lindsay Hummel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collier v. Burnes et al
as 3:2022cv00300
Petitioner:
Darron LaShawn Collier
Respondent:
Ty Burnes and James Milton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. IRS
as 6:2022cv00015
Plaintiff:
Milton Lee Gardner
Defendant:
IRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doucette, Jr. et al v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01297
Plaintiff:
Milton J. Doucette, Jr. and Lisa M. Doucette
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc., Ford Motor Company and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Nettles v. Ojiako et al
as 3:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
Milton Wayne Nettles
Defendant:
Oleka U Ojiako, Prince O Okoronkwo, Tennissia M Fieldsa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Townsend et al
as 4:2021cv03962
Plaintiff:
Milton Keith Perkins
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend, Dr. Edgar Hulipas, Mrs. L. Martha Beck N.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
